An island of mediocre relevance

History’s greatest strength is also its deepest weakness. When history ceased to be the application of rhetoric to the knowledge of the past in view of informing the present and warning about the future – models of behaviour to follow and unethical examples to avoid -, it also lost most of its popular appeal. The prestige of the historian today is located somewhere above the politician and below the scientist. In fact, the historian is both, a rhetor and a lab technician, a persuader and an analyst. But because of this, the historical profession is marooned on an island of mediocre relevance. Biography may escape this splendid isolation. Popular history is not doing bad at all, though I wouldn’t be too quick to celebrate the apparent prosperity. Scientific, serious, academic history, on the other hand, may need to take a minute to think about its future. And its relevance in a fast changing world.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s